« Groupthink and the Internet | Some Changes (Updated) »
August 12, 2006
Saturday Afternoon
The war continues to gnaw at me, in spite of the UN deal. I am more restive than usual, and have taken to sniping at dear friends for no reason. Polls in Lebanon and Israel both fascinate and horrify me as they continue to reinforce the vile predictability of human nature.
Not to mention bad decisionmaking at the highest levels.
Condi bet on Israel's ability to wipe the floor with Hezbollah, Olmert bet on a "quick win" using airstrikes, and Hezbollah bet on Nasrallah's ability to cast anything that wasn't a complete rout as a complete victory (i.e. punching above its weight and standing up to mighty Israel even as Arab leaders cowered behind craven rhetoric). Obviously Hezbollah won, if one can truthfully stare at the smoldering heap that is Lebanon and call it victory.
The blogosphere is a cesspool of bizarre and hateful fantasies. On the East side, there are idiots who say that the only way to solve this problem is to declare jihad and vanquish Israel for good (because Hezbollah not getting utterly creamed in 48 hours obviously means that the Arab states working together could somehow pull this off). On the West side, we have equally absurd solutions that involve invading both Iran and Syria and not handwringing over dead women and children because they're all terrorist collaborators anyway. This perspective makes sense if one observes how President Bush consistently stays on message by spinning every event as yet another front of the war on terror (I recall being amused at how this position bit him in the ass during the DPW fiasco as he vainly tried to explain how the Emiratis were "good guys" despite being darkie Muslims).
The US gambled on Lebanon and lost badly. It is now viewed as the architect of three wars in the Middle East, two of which are going very badly (Afghanistan isn't very stable either, but hardly anyone is paying attention). American diplomacy has been alternately nonexistent, naive or clumsy in its handling of the Lebanon crisis, and the US administration appears to have offered incontroveritible proof to Arabs that pro-American orientation is worth little when Israel's interests are threatened. Contrary to right wing jingoistic moron claims, MENA public opinion does matter and should not be dismissed so casually.
Olmert clearly bet on a fast and clean operation. I doubt Sharon would've been so clueless, having been stung previously. Broad popular support for this war in Israel suggests to me a sort of widespread cognitive dissonance, a belief that constant and unrelenting displays of force will eventually break an enemy. Likewise on the Hezbollah side, where constant bleeding is the key to breaking an enemy.
Has it worked yet? Let me know when it does.
This aside, I am putting down my terrorism and MENA history books for the moment, and distracting myself with fiction instead. Last night I even managed to finish Possession, which, despite the plodding prose and pretentious literary wanking, turned out to be a beautiful and well-crafted story. I also plan to finish Shalimar the Clown by Salman Rushdie, another author who seems to be in love with himself, but occasionally writes well. As the book appears to center around women and honor, it might be worth commenting on later.
PS - Matthew, I finally picked up Michael Collins. Happy now?
Posted by eerie at August 12, 2006 06:08 PM
Filed Under:
Personal
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.aqoul.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/2888
Comments
"This aside, I am putting down my terrorism and MENA history books for the moment, and distracting myself with fiction instead."
When you write analytical columns this good, put it on the main page! Then go off and get distracted.
"PS - Matthew, I finally picked up Michael Collins. Happy now?"
Justice delayed is justice denied. Though we all envy Collins for him being picked up by you.
Posted by: matthew hogan at August 13, 2006 11:53 AM
to drag this converstaion off topic, http://www.ahmadinejad.ir/
yes, President Ahmadinejad has his own blog now. and it's legit.
Posted by: drdougfir
at August 13, 2006 07:12 PM
the plot thickens.
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article1219021.ece
Explaina the Israeli overreaction, which in this light was not an overreaction, but planned.
Posted by: Klaus
at August 14, 2006 09:39 AM
Nice catch Klaus, very interesting.
Posted by: eerie
at August 14, 2006 12:36 PM
yes, President Ahmadinejad has his own blog now. and it's legit.
Wow. Truly a man of the people.
Posted by: eerie
at August 14, 2006 12:45 PM
I can't wait until he has his own podcast or vblog!
If only every world leader had his or her own blog...
Posted by: drdougfir
at August 14, 2006 12:48 PM
ah. There was a daily show sketch on bin Laden's speeches available on iTunes as mp3s, remixes (In Da Cave remix) and everything.
Posted by: Klaus
at August 14, 2006 01:35 PM
klaus: that comment is entirely useless without links.
i can only imagine what the daily show and colbert report will do tonight RE: ahmadine-blog.
Posted by: drdougfir
at August 14, 2006 01:37 PM
Maybe he's hoping for a career in show business.
Posted by: Eva Luna at August 14, 2006 03:08 PM
drdougfir, I'm sorry to report that clip is gone from Commie Central's online videos. Alas. It was the 01/23/06 show.
but this keeps making me laugh (media player link):
http://www.comedycentral.com/sitewide/media_player/play.jhtml?itemId=25193
Posted by: Klaus
at August 14, 2006 07:25 PM
If only every world leader had his or her own blog...
The blogs of world leaders would be written by the same spin doctors who do the regular press releases.
Besides, these guys strike me as rather old and out of touch. The sort of men who have secretaries print out their emails because they can't use Outlook.
Posted by: eerie
at August 15, 2006 10:24 AM
regarding this, it's normal to have a ghostwriter for opinion letters from politicians. The politician just signs it when it's done.
I wonder if the figurehead posture of politicians is a pragmatic necessity or not. In any case, I don't have to like it.
Posted by: Klaus
at August 15, 2006 07:52 PM
Likewise on the Hezbollah side, where constant bleeding is the key to breaking an enemy.
Has it worked yet? Let me know when it does.
I would assume that many ashkenazi jews can more or less easily relocate to the West if the shit got too unbearable. Especially those who immigrated there in their lifetime... Maybe that's something that Hezbollah is counting on. The Israelis have a much higher way of life to fall off from than the average arab does... But like the boiling frog, you can't do this over time or people get used to it. You have to scare the hell out of people at once, like during al-Naqba... Then people leave.
Posted by: Frandroid Atreides at August 16, 2006 11:20 PM

RSS



